(1) Project of the month: IHEYO Youth Conference 2009 in Nepal

International Humanist Youth Conference in October 2009 in Kathmandu, Nepal

 

The topic of the 2009 Youth Conference will be ”Secularism – the open door for human rights defense“,
discussing human rights questions on a course and focusing on youth humanism globally as also how we as individuals and as organizations can work to enhance our common goals.
The conference will address the need of a workable network inside IHEYO and mostly in the working groups to motivate more groups worldwide to join. Humanist organizers and human rights activists will gain further knowledge on how to get their messages across through in an appealing, effective way and learn about multiplier tasks. IHEYO aims to support youth humanist leaders from developing countries to attend this event.

 

In the next days IHEYO will announce the exact dates and procedures for applying for that event and hopes to receive lots of intersted participamt emails.

(2) Portray of the month: Charles Robert Darwin

Charles Robert Darwin (12 February 1809 – 19 April 1882) was an English naturalist, who realised and demonstrated that all species of life have evolved over time from common ancestors through the process he called natural selection. The fact that evolution occurs became accepted by the scientific community and the general public in his lifetime, while his theory of natural selection came to be widely seen as the primary explanation of the process of evolution in the 1930s, and now forms the basis of modern evolutionary theory. In modified form, Darwin’s scientific discovery remains the foundation of biology, as it provides a unifying logical explanation for the diversity of life. Darwin developed his interest in natural history while studying medicine at Edinburgh University, then theology at Cambridge. His five-year voyage on the Beagle established him as an eminent geologist whose observations and theories supported Charles Lyell’s uniformitarian ideas, and publication of his journal of the voyage made him famous as a popular author. Puzzled by the geographical distribution of wildlife and fossils he collected on the voyage, Darwin investigated the transmutation of species and conceived his theory of natural selection in 1838. Although he discussed his ideas with several naturalists, he needed time for extensive research and his geological work had priority. He was writing up his theory in 1858 when Alfred Russel Wallace sent him an essay which described the same idea, prompting immediate joint publication of both of their theories. His 1859 book On the Origin of Species established evolution by common descent as the dominant scientific explanation of diversification in nature. He examined human evolution and sexual selection in The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex, followed by The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals. His research on plants was published in a series of books, and in his final book, he examined earthworms and their effect on soil.

Biography

Early life

Charles Robert Darwin was born in Shrewsbury, Shropshire, England on 12 February 1809. He was the fifth of six children of wealthy society doctor and financier Robert Darwin, and Susannah Darwin (née Wedgwood). Both families were largely Unitarian, though the Wedgwoods were adopting Anglicanism. Robert Darwin, himself quietly a freethinker, made a nod toward convention by having baby Charles baptised in the Anglican Church, but Charles and his siblings attended the Unitarian chapel with their mother. The eight year old Charles already had a taste for natural history and collecting when he joined the day school run by its preacher in 1817. Darwin spent the summer of 1825 as an apprentice doctor, helping his father treat the poor of Shropshire, before going with Erasmus to the University of Edinburgh. He found lectures dull and surgery distressing, so neglected his medical studies. He learned taxidermy from John Edmonstone, a freed black slave who had accompanied Charles Waterton in the South American rainforest, and often sat with this "very pleasant and intelligent man".Darwin was later recommended as a suitable (if unfinished) naturalist for the unpaid position of gentleman’s companion to Robert FitzRoy, the captain of HMS Beagle, which was to leave in four weeks on an expedition to chart the coastline of South America. His father objected to the planned two-year voyage, regarding it as a waste of time, but was persuaded by his brother-in-law, Josiah Wedgwood, to agree to his son’s participation.

 

 

Journey of the Beagle

The voyage lasted almost five years and, as FitzRoy had intended, Darwin spent most of that time on land investigating geology and making natural history collections, while the Beagle surveyed and charted coasts. He kept careful notes of his observations and theoretical speculations, and at intervals during the voyage his specimens were sent to Cambridge together with letters including a copy of his journal for his family. He had some expertise in geology, beetle collecting and dissecting marine invertebrates, but in all other areas was a novice and ably collected specimens for expert appraisal. As HMS Beagle surveyed the coasts of South America, Darwin theorised about geology and extinction of giant mammals.Three Fuegians on board, who had been seized during the first Beagle voyage around February 1830 and spent a year in England, were taken back to Tierra del Fuego as missionaries. Darwin found them friendly and civilised, yet their relatives seemed “miserable, degraded savages”, as different as wild from domesticated animals. To Darwin the difference showed cultural advances, not racial inferiority. Unlike his scientist friends, he now thought there was no unbridgeable gap between humans and animals. A year on, the mission had been abandoned. The Fuegian they'd named Jemmy Button lived like the other natives, had a wife, and had no wish to return to England. The Beagle investigated how the atolls of the Cocos (Keeling) Islands had formed, and the survey supported Darwin's theorising. FitzRoy began writing the official Narrative of the Beagle voyages, and after reading Darwin’s diary he proposed incorporating it into the account. Darwin's Journal was eventually rewritten as a separate third volume, on natural history.

Inception of Darwin’s evolutionary theory

When the Beagle returned on 2 October 1836, Darwin was already a celebrity in scientific circles as in December 1835 Henslow had fostered his former pupil’s reputation by giving selected naturalists a pamphlet of Darwin’s geological letters. Darwin visited his home in Shrewsbury and saw relatives, then hurried to Cambridge to see Henslow, who advised on finding naturalists available to catalogue the collections and agreed to take on the botanical specimens. Darwin’s father organised investments, enabling his son to be a self-funded gentleman scientist, and an excited Darwin went round the London institutions being fêted and seeking experts to describe the collections. Zoologists had a huge backlog of work, and there was a danger of specimens just being left in storage. In mid-July 1837 Darwin started his first notebook on Transmutation of Species, his “B” notebook, and on page 36 wrote “I think” above his first sketch of an evolutionary tree.In his “B” notebook begun in mid-July his novel ideas of transmutation discarded Lamarck's independent lineages progressing to higher forms, and saw life as genealogical branching of a single evolutionary tree, in which "It is absurd to talk of one animal being higher than another".

Overwork, illness, and marriage

William Whewell pushed Darwin to take on the duties of Secretary of the Geological Society. After initially declining the work, he accepted the post in March 1838. Despite the grind of writing and editing the Beagle reports, Darwin made remarkable progress on transmutation, taking every opportunity to question expert naturalists and, unconventionally, people with practical experience such as farmers and pigeon fanciers. Over time his research drew on information from his relatives and children, the family butler, neighbours, colonists and former shipmates. He included mankind in his speculations from the outset, and on seeing an orangutan in the zoo on 28 March 1838 noted its child-like behaviour. Continuing his research in London, Darwin’s wide reading now included the sixth edition of Malthus’s An Essay on the Principle of PopulationIn October 1838, that is, fifteen months after I had begun my systematic enquiry, I happened to read for amusement Malthus on Population, and being well prepared to appreciate the struggle for existence which everywhere goes on from long-continued observation of the habits of animals and plants, it at once struck me that under these circumstances favourable variations would tend to be preserved, and unfavourable ones to be destroyed. The result of this would be the formation of new species. Here, then, I had at last got a theory by which to work...Malthus asserted that unless human population is kept in check, it increases in a geometrical progression and soon exceeds food supply in what is known as a Malthusian catastrophe. Darwin was well prepared to see at once that this also applied to de Candolle’s “warring of the species” of plants and the struggle for existence among wildlife, explaining how numbers of a species kept roughly stable. As species always breed beyond available resources, favourable variations would make organisms better at surviving and passing the variations on to their offspring, while unfavourable variations would be lost. This would result in the formation of new species. On 28 September 1838 he noted this insight, describing it as a kind of wedging, forcing adapted structures into gaps in the economy of nature as weaker structures were thrust out. Over the following months he compared farmers picking the best breeding stock to a Malthusian Nature selecting from variants thrown up by “chance” so that “every part of [every] newly acquired structure is fully practised and perfected”, and thought this analogy “the most beautiful part of my theory”.

Preparing the theory of natural selection for publication

Darwin now had the framework of his theory of natural selection “by which to work”, as his “prime hobby”. His research included animal husbandry and extensive experiments with plants, finding evidence that species were not fixed and investigating many detailed ideas to refine and substantiate his theory. For more than a decade this work was in the background to his main occupation, publication of the scientific results of the Beagle voyage. When FitzRoy’s Narrative was published in May 1839, Darwin’s Journal and Remarkswas such a success as the third volume that later that year it was published on its own. Darwin completed his third geological book in 1846. In 1847, Hooker read the “Essay” and sent notes that provided Darwin with the calm critical feedback that he needed, but would not commit himself and questioned Darwin’s opposition to continuing acts of creation.

Publication of the theory of natural selection

Lyell was intrigued by Darwin’s speculations without realising their extent. When he read a paper by Alfred Russel Wallace on the Introduction of species, he saw similarities with Darwin’s thoughts and urged him to publish to establish precedence. Though Darwin saw no threat, he began work on a short paper. Finding answers to difficult questions held him up repeatedly, and he expanded his plans to a “big book on species” titled Natural Selection. He continued his researches, obtaining information and specimens from naturalists worldwide including Wallace who was working in Borneo. The American botanist Asa Gray showed similar interests, and on 5 September 1857 Darwin sent Gray a detailed outline of his ideas including an abstract of Natural Selection. In December, Darwin received a letter from Wallace asking if the book would examine human origins. He responded that he would avoid that subject, “so surrounded with prejudices”, while encouraging Wallace’s theorising and adding that “I go much further than you.” Darwin’s book was half way when, on 18 June 1858, he received a paper from Wallace describing natural selection. Shocked that he had been “forestalled”, Darwin sent it on to Lyell, as requested, and, though Wallace had not asked for publication, he suggested he would send it to any journal that Wallace chose. There was little immediate attention to this announcement of the theory; after the paper was published in the August journal of the society, it was reprinted in several magazines and there were some reviews and letters, but the president of the Linnean remarked in May 1859 that the year had not been marked by any revolutionary discoveries. On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or The Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life (usually abbreviated to On the Origin of Species) proved unexpectedly popular, with the entire stock of 1,250 copies oversubscribed when it went on sale to booksellers on 22 November 1859. In the book, Darwin set out “one long argument” of detailed observations, inferences and consideration of anticipated objections. His only allusion to human evolution was the understatement that “light will be thrown on the origin of man and his history”. His theory is simply stated in the introduction:As many more individuals of each species are born than can possibly survive; and as, consequently, there is a frequently recurring struggle for existence, it follows that any being, if it vary however slightly in any manner profitable to itself, under the complex and sometimes varying conditions of life, will have a better chance of surviving, and thus be naturally selected. From the strong principle of inheritance, any selected variety will tend to propagate its new and modified form.He put a strong case for common descent, but avoided the then controversial term “evolution”, and at the end of the book concluded that;There is grandeur in this view of life, with its several powers, having been originally breathed into a few forms or into one; and that, whilst this planet has gone cycling on according to the fixed law of gravity, from so simple a beginning endless forms most beautiful and most wonderful have been, and are being, evolved.

Reaction to the publication

The book aroused international interest, with less controversy than had greeted the popular Vestiges of Creation. Though Darwin’s illness kept him away from the public debates, he eagerly scrutinised the scientific response, commenting on press cuttings, reviews, articles, satires and caricatures, and corresponded on it with colleagues worldwide. The Church of England's response was mixed. Darwin’s old Cambridge tutors Sedgwick and Henslow dismissed the ideas, but liberal clergymen interpreted natural selection as an instrument of God's design, with the cleric Charles Kingsley seeing it as "just as noble a conception of Deity". In 1860, the publication of Essays and Reviews by seven liberal Anglican theologians diverted clerical attention from Darwin, with its ideas including higher criticism attacked by church authorities as heresy. In it, Baden Powell argued that miracles broke God’s laws, so belief in them was atheistic, and praised “Mr Darwin’s masterly volume [supporting] the grand principle of the self-evolving powers of nature”. Asa Gray discussed teleology with Darwin, who imported and distributed Gray’s pamphlet on theistic evolution, Natural Selection is not inconsistent with Natural Theology. In a legendary confrontation at the public 1860 Oxford evolution debate during a meeting of the British Association for the Advancement of Science, the Bishop of Oxford Samuel Wilberforce, though not opposed to transmutation of species, argued against Darwin's explanation. In the ensuing debate Joseph Hooker argued strongly for Darwin and Thomas Huxley established himself as “Darwin’s bulldog”. Both sides came away feeling victorious, with Huxley claiming that on being asked by Wilberforce whether he was descended from monkeys on his grandfather’s side or his grandmother’s side, Huxley muttered: “The Lord has delivered him into my hands” and replied that he “would rather be descended from an ape than from a cultivated man who used his gifts of culture and eloquence in the service of prejudice and falsehood”. Even Darwin's close friends Gray, Hooker, Huxley and Lyell still expressed various reservations but gave strong support, as did many others, particularly younger naturalists. Gray and Lyell sought reconciliation with faith, while Huxley portrayed a polarisation between religion and science. The Origin of Species was translated into many languages, becoming a staple scientific text attracting thoughtful attention from all walks of life, including the “working men” who flocked to Huxley’s lectures. Darwin’s theory also resonated with various movements at the time and became a key fixture of popular culture. Darwinism became a movement covering a wide range of evolutionary ideas. In 1863 Lyell's Geological Evidences of the Antiquity of Man popularised prehistory, though his caution on evolution disappointed Darwin. Weeks later Huxley's Evidence as to Man's Place in Nature showed that anatomically, humans are apes, then The Naturalist on the River Amazons by Henry Walter Bates provided empirical evidence of natural selection. Lobbying brought Darwin Britain's highest scientific honour, the Royal Society’s Copley Medal, awarded on 3 November 1864. That day, Huxley held the first meeting of what became the influential X Club devoted to "science, pure and free, untrammelled by religious dogmas".

Descent of Man, sexual selection, and botany

He had published On the Origin of Species as an abstract of his theory, but more controversial aspects of his “big book” were still incomplete, including his views on humankind’s descent from earlier animals, and possible causes underlying the development of society and of human mental abilities. He had yet to explain features with decorative beauty but no obvious utility. His experiments, research and writing continued.The first part of Darwin's planned “big book”, Variation of Plants and Animals Under Domestication, grew to two huge volumes, forcing him to leave out human evolution and sexual selection. It sold briskly in 1868 despite its size, but interest tailed off. He wrote most of a second section on natural selection, but it remained unpublished in his lifetime. Lyell had already popularised human prehistory, and Huxley had shown that anatomically humans are apes. With The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex published in 1871, Darwin set out evidence from numerous sources that humans are animals, showing continuity of physical and mental attributes, and presented sexual selection to explain impractical animal features such as the peacock's plumage as well as human evolution of culture, differences between sexes, and physical and cultural racial characteristics, while emphasising that humans are all one species. His research using images was expanded in his 1872 book The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals, one of the first books to feature printed photographs, which discussed the evolution of human psychology and its continuity with the behaviour of animals. Both books proved very popular, and Darwin was impressed by the general assent with which his views had been received, remarking that "everybody is talking about it without being shocked." His conclusion was "that man with all his noble qualities, with sympathy which feels for the most debased, with benevolence which extends not only to other men but to the humblest living creature, with his god-like intellect which has penetrated into the movements and constitution of the solar system–with all these exalted powers–Man still bears in his bodily frame the indelible stamp of his lowly origin.”He died in Downe, Kent, England, on 19 April 1882. He had expected to be buried in St Mary’s churchyard at Downe, but at the request of Darwin’s colleagues, William Spottiswoode (President of the Royal Society) arranged for Darwin to be given a state funeral and buried in Westminster Abbey, close to John Herschel and Isaac Newton. Only five non-royal personages were granted that honour of a UK state funeral during the 19th century.

Religious views

Though Charles Darwin’s family background was Nonconformist, and his father, grandfather and brother were Freethinkers, at first he did not doubt the literal truth of the Bible. He attended a Church of England school, then at Cambridge studied Anglican theology to become a clergyman. He was convinced by William Paley’s teleological argument that design in nature proved the existence of God, but during the Beagle voyage he questioned, for example, why deep-ocean plankton had been created with so much beauty for little purpose as no one could see them, or the problem of evil of how the ichneumon wasp paralysing caterpillars as live food for its eggs could be reconciled with Paley’s vision of beneficent design. He was still quite orthodox and would quote the Bible as an authority on morality, but was critical of the history in the Old Testament. When investigating transmutation of species he knew that his naturalist friends thought this a bestial heresy undermining miraculous justifications for the social order, the kind of radical argument then being used by Dissenters and atheists to attack the Church of England’s privileged position as the established church. Though Darwin wrote of religion as a tribal survival strategy, he still believed that God was the ultimate lawgiver. His belief dwindled, and his grief at the death of his daughter Annie in 1851 made him more certain in his scepticism. He continued to help the local church with parish work, but on Sundays would go for a walk while his family attended church. He now thought it better to look at pain and suffering as the result of general laws rather than direct intervention by God. When asked about his religious views, he wrote that he had never been an atheist in the sense of denying the existence of a God, and that generally “an Agnostic would be the more correct description of my state of mind.”

Political interpretations

Darwin’s theories and writings, combined with Gregor Mendel’s genetics (the “modern synthesis”), form the basis of all modern biology. However, Darwin’s fame and popularity led to his name being associated with ideas and movements which at times had only an indirect relation to his writings, and sometimes went directly against his express comments.

Eugenics

Darwin was interested by his half-cousin Francis Galton's argument, introduced in 1865, that statistical analysis of heredity showed that moral and mental human traits could be inherited, and principles of animal breeding could apply to humans. In The Descent of Man Darwin noted that aiding the weak to survive and have families could lose the benefits of natural selection, but cautioned that withholding such aid would endanger the instinct of sympathy, "the noblest part of our nature", and factors such as education could be more important. When Galton suggested that publishing research could encourage intermarriage within a "caste" of "those who are naturally gifted", Darwin foresaw practical difficulties, and thought it "the sole feasible, yet I fear utopian, plan of procedure in improving the human race", preferring to simply publicise the importance of inheritance and leave decisions to individuals. Galton named the field of study Eugenics in 1883, after Darwin’s death, and developed biometrics. Eugenics movements were widespread at a time when Darwin's natural selection was eclipsed by Mendelian genetics, and in some countries including Belgium, Brazil, Canada, Sweden and the United States, compulsory sterilisation laws were imposed. Nazi eugenics in Germany discredited the idea.

Social Darwinism

Writers used natural selection to argue for various, often contradictory, ideologies such as laissez-faire dog-eat dog capitalism, racism, warfare, colonialism and imperialism. However, Darwin's holistic view of nature included "dependence of one being on another", thus pacifists, socialists, liberal social reformers and anarchists. Darwin himself insisted that social policy should not simply be guided by concepts of struggle and selection in nature. The term “Social Darwinism” was used infrequently from around the 1890s, but became popular as a derogatory term in the 1940s when used by Richard Hofstadter to attack the laissez-faire conservatism of those like William Graham Sumner who opposed reform and socialism. Since then it has been used as a term of abuse by those opposed to what they think are the moral consequences of evolution.

Darwin 2009 commemorations

Two pound coin commemorating Darwin's birth and publication of On the Origin of Species.The bicentenary of Darwin's birth and the 150th anniversary of the publication of On the Origin of Species are being celebrated by events and publications around the world.^[166] The “Darwin” exhibition, after opening at the American Museum of Natural History in New York City in 2006, was shown at the Museum of Science, Boston, the Field Museum in Chicago, the Royal Ontario Museum in Toronto, then from 14 November 2008 to 19 April 2009 in the Natural History Museum, London, as part of the Darwin200 programme of events across the United Kingdom. The University of Cambridge features a festival in July 2009. In the United Kingdom a special commemorative issue of the two pound coin shows a portrait of Darwin facing an ape surrounded by the inscription 1809 DARWIN 2009, with the edge inscription ON THE ORIGIN OF SPECIES 1859. Collector versions of the coin will be released at a premium, and during the year the coins will be available from banks and post offices at face value. In September 2008, the Church of England issued an article saying that the 200th anniversary of his birth was a fitting time to apologise to Darwin for "for misunderstanding you and, by getting our first reaction wrong, encouraging others to misunderstand you still".

Works

Darwin was a prolific author, and even without publication of his works on evolution would have had a considerable reputation as the author of The Voyage of the Beagle, as a geologist who had published extensively on South America and had solved the puzzle of the formation of coral atolls, and as a biologist who had published the definitive work on barnacles. While The Origin of Species dominates perceptions of his work, The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex and The Expression of Emotions in Man and Animals had considerable impact, and his books on plants including The Power of Movement in Plants were innovative studies of great importance, as was his final work on The Formation of Vegetable Mould Through the Action of Worms. The standard author abbreviation Darwin is used to indicate this individual as the author when citing a botanical name.

Notes

I. ^{^}  Darwin was eminent as a naturalist, geologist, biologist, and author; after working as a physician’s assistant and two years as a medical student was educated as a clergyman; and was trained in taxidermy.II. ^{^}  Robert FitzRoy was to become known after the voyage for biblical literalism, but at this time he had considerable interest in Lyell’s ideas, and they met before the voyage when Lyell asked for observations to be made in South America. FitzRoy’s diary during the ascent of the River Santa Cruz in Patagonia recorded his opinion that the plains were raised beaches, but on return, newly married to a very religious lady, he recanted these ideas. (Browne 1995, pp. 186, 414)III. ^{^}  See, for example, WILLA volume 4, Charlotte Perkins Gilman and the Feminization of Education by Deborah M. De Simone: “Gilman shared many basic educational ideas with the generation of thinkers who matured during the period of “intellectual chaos” caused by Darwin’s Origin of the Species. Marked by the belief that individuals can direct human and social evolution, many progressives came to view education as the panacea for advancing social progress and for solving such problems as urbanisation, poverty, or immigration.”IV. ^{^}  See, for example, the song “A lady fair of lineage high” from Gilbert and Sullivan’s Princess Ida, which describes the descent of man (but not woman!) from apes.V. ^{^}  Geneticists studied human heredity as Mendelian inheritance, while eugenics movements sought to manage society, with a focus on social class in the United Kingdom, and on disability and ethnicity in the United States, leading to geneticists seeing this as impractical pseudoscience. A shift from voluntary arrangements to "negative" eugenics included compulsory sterilisation laws in the United States, copied by Nazi Germany as the basis for Nazi eugenics based on virulent racism and "racial hygiene".
(Thurtle, Phillip (Updated December 17, 1996), "the creation of genetic identity", SEHR 5 (Supplement: Cultural and Technological Incubations of Fascism), http://www.stanford.edu/group/SHR/5-supp/text/thurtle.html, retrieved on 11 November 2008 
Edwards, A. W. F. (2000), "The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection", Genetics 154 (April 2000): 1419-1426, http://www.genetics.org/cgi/content/full/154/4/1419#The_Eclipse_of_Darwinism, retrieved on 11 November 2008 
Wilkins, John. "Evolving Thoughts: Darwin and the Holocaust 3: eugenics". Retrieved on 2008-11-11.)VI. ^{^}  Darwin did not share the then common view that other races are inferior, and regarded his taxidermy tutor John Edmonstone, a freed black slave, as a "very pleasant and intelligent man".Early in the Beagle voyage he nearly lost his position on the ship when he criticised FitzRoy's defence and praise of slavery. (Darwin, p. 74) He wrote home about "how steadily the general feeling, as shown at elections, has been rising against Slavery. What a proud thing for England if she is the first European nation which utterly abolishes it! I was told before leaving England that after living in slave countries all my opinions would be altered; the only alteration I am aware of is forming a much higher estimate of the negro character." (Darwin 1887, p. 246) Regarding Fuegians, he "could not have believed how wide was the difference between savage and civilized man: it is greater than between a wild and domesticated animal, inasmuch as in man there is a greater power of improvement", but he knew and liked civilised Fuegians like Jemmy Button: "It seems yet wonderful to me, when I think over all his many good qualities, that he should have been of the same race, and doubtless partaken of the same character, with the miserable, degraded savages whom we first met here. (Darwin 1845, pp. 205, 207–208)In the Descent of Man he mentioned the Fuegians and Edmonstone when arguing against "ranking the so-called races of man as distinct species".He rejected the ill-treatment of native people, and for example wrote of massacres of Patagonian men, women, and children, "Every one here is fully convinced that this is the most just war, because it is against barbarians. Who would believe in this age that such atrocities could be committed in a Christian civilized country?" (Darwin 1845)Taken from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Darwin

 

(3) IHEYO member: BundesJuhus

Dear IHEYO members,

We are glad to be part of IHEYO in order to support and learn from other humanist associations in the international sphere whose main focus lies on youth issues and youth work. Potsdam 2008 was a new step for us! The admission motivates us to be included in projects on an international level and to cooperate with IHEYO and its members. We would like to contribute to realize the ideas and aims of IHEYO here in Germany.

BundesJuHu is the umbrella organization of youth organizations, that belong to the federal associations of the “German humanism organization” (HVD). Our main function is the coordination between the federal youth associations. That implies helping and supporting each other, creating new financial possibilities for activities and establishing and realizing corporate projects. We are also a platform for communal and federal associations to take influence and to be recognized by society and political representatives.

The concrete practical work of our members takes place on communal and federal levels. Their spheres of work have congruencies but at the same time a lot of differences: emphasizes reach from supporting and
organizing projects like youth travel (in Germany and other European countries), over international youth exchange, to discussions about societal and political issues: Additionally, focuses lie on the “Jugendfeier”
(civic initiation ceremony) and other cultural offers by the HVD, cooperation with NGOs and other associations, political education of youth e.g. to support democracy and to stop extremism and inhuman
behavior, supporting social projects, issuing statements to political and societal issues and many more activities.

The recent most important activity to be realized was the first national meeting of BundesJuHu in October 2008 in Berlin. Nearly forty young humanists from Berlin, Brandenburg, Lower Saxony Magdeburg, North
Rhine-Westphalia, Saxony and Württemberg discussed ideas, future internal and external activities as well as projects. On the last day of the national meeting, the general assembly elected a new executive board and made decisions about internal and external cooperation, internal communication and public relations to further develop BundesJuHu.

BundesJuHu is glad to have found a partner in you in cooperation with whom we want to elaborate and progress in our common aims and visions.

‘Viele Grüße aus Deutschland’,

your BundesJuHus.

Contact: internationales@juhu-bund.de

Visit us on www.juhu-bund.de.

(4) Column - Being Humanist by Yemi Johnson

Being Humanists, Staying Humanists

Humanism as a lifestance, if we are to be sincere with ourselves, is a belief
being held by very few, yet bold, individuals across the world.
Whether 'in the closet' or 'out of closet’, there are thousands of
global citizens today that subscribe to the belief in 'humanity for
humanity'. Unlike other beliefs that evangelize, seek members and
even threaten to kill in order to recruit members, humanists by
virtue of our belief, do not preach to others to join our group
unless such person(s) expresses the desire to embrace reason and
science. This difference is not problematic. That which is
problematic and of great concern is how we handle our members: how we
make them have a sense of belonging so as to want to stay. Experience
has shown that many humanist organizations, whether in Europe,
America, Africa or Asia, are bad managers of their membership-fold.

To start with, let me note here that the root of our lackadaisical
attitude to who stays or goes is traceable to the foundation of our
belief, Individual Liberty; that strong conviction that every
thinking human being has the ability to reason and take decisions
that they consider best advantageous to themselves. This is jejune
and complicated. Its 'jejunity' stems from the fact that it is
harmful to suppose that since everyone has the liberty to enter and
exit the humanist-fold, they should not be disturbed in any of their
actions. Have we asked or paused to ruminate on the reason(s) for
their exit? Why, for instance, will any right thinking human being,
man or woman seeks to leave members of his 'faith' whether to join
another or to stay aloof for sometimes? The point is simply that the
humanistic freedom is overrated! And it is often naively handled by
the humanist leaders! While hammering on 'freedom', we have not been
considering 'sense of belonging', which is vital in any
inter-personal, inter-group, and even, inter-national relationships.
For wherever there are two to three persons, it is psychologically
important for everyone to have and be offered the feeling of 'being
important and loved'; for that is what membership is ideally about.

The Oxford Advanced Learners Dictionary defines the term 'membership' as
"the state of being a member of a group, a club,
an organization, etc". The emphasis on 'state of being' is
intentional and it is to draw attention to the fact that the person
in question is part and parcel nay essential part of that
organization, club or group that he or she has subscribed to be part
of. Membership can therefore said to be a coin with two sides,
namely, rights and responsibilities. Signing-up to be
part of a group conferred certain unequivocal rights on both the
group and the individual members like the right to vote, right to
aspire, among others, and responsibilities such as due payment,
seeking for the growth and development of the group, among others.
One germane responsibility that was purposely left out is the group's
RESPONSIBILITY to give every member a sense of belonging, being loved
and wanted.

Many humanist groups are guilty of allowing their liberality to stand in
the way of this vital responsibility that seems to determine
membership entry and exit. Not that we do not care but we do not see
it as a responsibility to 'disturb others unnecessarily'. When a
member does not receive any call, e-mail or post mail from his/her
organization for a whole year, of what use is such an organization?
When a once active member suddenly become silent, what do we do? Do
we even bother to update our members on the activities of the group?
Do we conduct surveys on vital issues as it affects the group's
visions sometimes? When disaster struck in an area where we have
members, what do we do? Do we even remember our members' birthdays?
Do we have active, not mere, mail-list or functional database of our
members or persons that have ever been in touch with our group? Do we
move beyond theoretical to practical life projects to avoid monotony
sometimes? Do we ever try to seek the opinion of our members as to
what they really want from our group?

This is not just about the responsibility of our leaders or the group's
staffs alone; it is the responsibility of every one of us. In fact,
it requires both personal, inter-personal and inter-group efficiency
and action, and even international action. There was a time for
instance, the IHEU, International Humanists and Ethical Union, ran a
vociferous campaign for the release of the 'Blasphemous' Pakistani
Doctor, Younus Shaikh. Dr. Younus was so glad he is part of the
global humanist family that his appreciation note could be textually
analysed to have been soaked in tears of fulfillment. When Deogratias
of the Uganda Humanist Association went missing for months on the
hummay2004 e-list, an enquiry from Josh of the British Humanist
Association leads to the information on the arrest of a  non-humanist
'Deogratias'. When our Deogratias eventually showed up, he was so
glad that at least someone somewhere appreciates what he is doing for
humanistic commonwealth.

There was a time a member of my group confessed to me that one of my
'Onwards!' once fired him up to pick the bits and pieces of his life.
The young man who was an active member of the Nigerian Humanist
Students Society at inception in 2001 dashed into thin air in 2003.
But because I had his email address, I made it a point of duty to
send him an e-mail once in three months, at least. He never replied
and I never give up. Although I didn't give up, I was not so keen
about his membership of the group but just happy not to let him be
without himself telling me just that. So, it continued unceasingly
for three years. I was amazed to receive a birthday mail from him on
22 September, 2006. Here is an excerpt:

Dear Yemi, I want to
wish you the best of the years ahead. Your 'hellos' have been of
immense benefit to my faith. Whenever am down, your
'are you okay?', 'onwards!' and forwarded humanistic messages
comforted me and reminded me of our intellectual exchanges. Happy
birthday, big brother!

The excerpt above had two effects on me: fulfillment and love. I was
filled with the vigour to continue to do more because the mail made
me realized that my efforts are never in vain. Secondly, the fact the
he could remember my birthday made me feel loved, that awesome
feeling that someone cares and did not forget you. In fact, that mail
came also at a time I was personally down; when a very close family
member was sick.

What could be gleaned from this example is the fact that showing love and
giving others a sense of belonging does have an effect on our
membership fold, and even on individual psyche. If therefore you are
leader today, and does not care about, or give a hoot, about who
leaves or stays in faith, I think you are not being sincere to that
belief and, to some extent, yourself. Extending a hand of fellowship
to other humanists, wherever they may be located in time and space,
is therefore an essential tool not only in keeping many in the
lifestance, but in ensuring that we do not unnecessarily lose those
we could keep in the fold. This is a new year, let’s plan and work
towards increasing this year. We can do it!

Onward!

Yemi Ademowo Johnson, socio-political philosopher and applied
anthropologist, is former Secretary General of IHEYO, Belgium, and
National Coordinator, Young Humanistas Network, Nigeria. Yemi,
co-author of Humanism,
Ethics and Africa,
is also a Columnist with the HEF Magazine Fritanke.

© 2008

(5) Announcement: Youth Campaign in India

Youth against Terrorism and Violence: Government of India Launched Campaign

 

Dr. M.S. Gill, Minister for Youth Affairs & Sports has launched a
nationwide campaign of youth against terrorism and violence

“Together For Peace”.

This nationwide campaign has been planned by Nehru Yuva Kendra Sangathan,
Ministry of Youth Affairs and Sports, to reaffirm their commitment to
peace and harmony. Starting from the National Youth Day, January 12,
2009 up to Mahatma Gandhi’s Martyrdom Day, January 30, 2009, a
nationwide campaign would strive to strengthen democratic, secular
and pluralist character of our country. The rural youth from 500
districts would organize seminars, debates, street plays, walks and
contact programme promoting plurality and togetherness.

On the occasion, Dr. Gill also released the Logo for the campaign. While
addressing the youth delegates from the neighbouring states, Dr. Gill
exhorted the youth to strive for strengthening democratic, secular
and pluralist character of our country.

Ms. Sindhushree Khullar, Secretary, Department of Youth Affairs
administered the pledge on the National Unity and Integrity to all
youth delegates present at the function.

ICYO - indianyouthorgs@yahoo.co.uk

(6) Book advice and more: Charles Darwin compact

The Complete Work of Charles Darwin Online (or Darwin Online)
is a freely-accessible website containing the complete print and
manuscript works of Charles Darwin, as well as related supplementary material.

 

Darwin Online is an online research project based at the University of
Cambridge. It aims to provide all available print and manuscript
material except unpublished letters, which are being made available
separately by the Darwin Correspondence Project.
In addition Darwin Online includes the largest bibliographical list
of Darwin's publications and the largest union catalogue of Darwin
papers and manuscripts. The site also provides an extensive
collection of related materials such as reviews of Darwin's books,
descriptions of his Beagle specimens, obituaries and recollections
and works cited or read by Darwin. There is also general history and
commentary--some from published sources and some prepared for the
project.

 

The project began in 2002 and first produced a pilot website, The
writings of Charles Darwin on the web,
replaced in October 2006 by the new website. The launch was widely
reported, and the project has been widely reviewed by professional
publications in biology, and librarianship.

 

The site contains at least one copy of all known Darwin publications,
both as searchable text (66,000 pages) and full colour images (80,000
images). Most of this material was not previously available on the
internet – or even never reproduced in any form. New items are
still being found and added, along with further editions and
translations. In April 2008 Darwin's private papers were launched.
The event marked the largest release of new materials by and about
Darwin ever published. The collection covers c. 20,000 items across
c. 90,000 electronic images. One notable item is the Diary of Emma
Darwin (1808-1896), Darwin's wife.

 

The site is accessible open access free of charge. It is copyright, with permission for non-commercial
use.

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Complete_Works_of_Charles_Darwin_Online